International Journal of Implant Dentistry – Agosto 2017 – Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system

International Journal of Implant Dentistry • Agosto 2017

Indagine sulle condizioni dei tessuti perimplantari e sulla stabilità dei tessuti perimplantari in impianti posizionati con simultaneo intervento additivo: analisi retrospettiva di follow-up su 3 anni di un impianto a livello osseo di recente sviluppo

Jonas Lorenz University Hospital Frankfurt · Department of oral, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, Henriette Lerner HL DENTCLINIC, Robert A. Sader Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main · Center of Stomatology
and Shahram Ghanaati Goethe University of Frankfurt/Main; Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz · Department for Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery; Institute of Pathology

Lo scopo della presente analisi retrospettiva è stato di valutare le condizioni dei tessuti perimplantari e documentare la stabilità dei tessuti perimplantari in impianti C-Tech posizionati simultaneamente con un intervento additivo GBR (Guided Bone Regeneration, rigenerazione ossea guidata).

È stato analizzato clinicamente e radiologicamente un totale di 47 impianti, posizionati simultaneamente con una procedura GBR (Guided Bone Regeneration, rigenerazione ossea guidata) con un materiale osseo sintetico sostitutivo in 20 pazienti, almeno 3 anni dopo il carico.

L’analisi di follow-up ha rivelato un tasso di sopravvivenza del 100% e tassi medio-bassi di profondità di sondaggio (2,7 mm) e BOP (indice di sanguinamento) (30%). Il PES (punteggio estetica rosa) medio era di 10,1 dal valore massimo di 14.
Non erano presenti difetti perimplantari manifesti, e la perdita ossea media è stata di 0,55 mm.

In conclusione, gli impianti inseriti in combinazione con una procedura GBR (Guided Bone Regeneration, rigenerazione ossea guidata) possono raggiungere risultati funzionalmente stabili ed esteticamente soddisfacenti a lungo termine per la sostituzione di denti mancanti in caso di atrofia della cresta alveolare.

Clicca per il download (.pdf) – International Journal of Implant Dentistry – Agosto 2017

References

1. Gurgel BC, Montenegro SC, Dantas PM, Pascoal AL, Lima KC, Calderon PD. Frequency of peri-implant diseases and associated factors. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; doi: 10.1111/clr.12944

2. Qian J, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Reasons for marginal bone loss around oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):792–807.

3. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello C, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2:81–90.

4. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the per iodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;21:189–93.

5. Moon I, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lindhe J. The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26:658–63.

6. Lindhe J, Berglundh T. The interface between the mucosa and the implant. Periodontol. 1998;17:47–54.

7. Masaki C, Nakamoto T, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, Hosokawa R. Strategies for alveolar ridge reconstruction and preservation for implant therapy. J Prosthodont Res. 2015;59(4):220–8.

8. Damien CJ, Parsons JR. Bone graft and bone graft substitutes: areview of current technology and applications. J Appl Biomater.1991;2:187–208.

9. Cordaro L, Torsello F, Miuccio MT, di Torresanto VM, Eliopoulos D. Mandibular bone harvesting for alveolar reconstruction and implant placement: subjective and objective cross-sectional evaluation of donor and recipient site up to 4 y
ears. Clinical Oral Impl Res. 2011;22:1320–6.

10. Canullo L, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Soldini C, Mazzocco F, Penarrocha M, Covani U. Microbiological assessment of the implant-abutment interface in different connections: cross-sectional study after 5 years of functional loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):426–34.

11. Misch C. Implant design considerations for the posterior regions of the mouth. Implant Dent. 1999;8(4).

12. SteigengaJ,al-ShammariK,NocitiF,MischC,WangH.Dentalimplant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent. 2001;12(4):306–17.

13. Canullo L, Pace F, Coelho P, Sciubba E, Vozza I. The influence of platform switching on the biomechanical aspects of the implant-abutment system. A three dimensional finite element study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(6):852–6.

14. Lerner H, Lorenz J, Sader R, Ghanaati S. Two-year retrospective study of periimplant health and periimplant bone stability after immediate implant placement of a newly developed bone level implant system—a first report.
EDI Journal (European Association of Dental Implantologists, Teamwork Media); 2017; ahead of print.

15. Ghanaati S, Lorenz J, Obreja K, Choukroun J, Landes C, Sader R. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite-base d material already contributes to implant stability after 3 months: a clinical and radiologic 3-year follow-up investigation. In: Journal of Or al Implantology. 2014;40(1):103–9.

16. Lorenz J, Kubesch A, Korzinskas T, Barbeck M, Landes C, Sader R, et al. TRAP-positive multinucleated giant cells are foreign body giant cells rather than osteoclasts: results from a split-mouth study in humans. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41(6):e257–66.

17. Barbeck M, Udeabor S, Lorenz J, Schlee M, Grosse Holthaus M, Raetscho N, et al. High-temperature sintering of xenogeneic bone substitutes leads to increased multinucleated giant cell formation: in vivo and preliminary clinical results. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41(5):e212–22.

18. Barbeck M, Udeabor S, Lorenz J, Kubesch A, Choukroun J, Sader R, et al. Induction of multinucleated giant cells in response to small sized bovine bone substitute (Bio-Oss TM) results in an enhanced early implantation bed vascularization. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2014;4(2):150–7.

19. Lorenz J, Barbeck M, Sader R, Russe P, Choukroun J, Kirkpatrick CJ, et al. Foreign body giant cell related encapsulation of a synthetic material three years after augmentation. J Oral Implantol. 2016;42(3):273–7.